Maryland tosses Diebold, for two very important reasons:
1. Don't Work.
2. Cost Too Much.
I heartily encourage the rest of the US to follow suit.
sporadically produced odds, ends, and essaylets on any number of topics from programming to politics, paramecia to puff pastries.
Thursday, February 16, 2006
Sunday, February 12, 2006
Next Up: Nuking Iran
Ex-U .N. inspector: Iran’s next And it'll be a nuke. There's nothing else left.
[...]
It's the only way we can go to war with anyone else right now. We don't have the manpower -- oh, unless you want a draft, and the Bush Administration loves their high-tech movie-plot weapons anyway -- God, I bet Bush'll hit that little red button and make a pious-sounding speech on TV that's really all about the size of the Presidential Weenie.
Ritter described how the U.S. government might justify war with Iran in a scenario similar to the buildup to the Iraq invasion. He also argued that Iran wants a nuclear energy program, and not nuclear weapons. But the Bush administration, he said, refuses to believe Iran is telling the truth.
[...]
Ritter also predicted the military strategy for war with Iran. First, American forces will bomb Iran. If Iranians don’t overthrow the current government, as Bush hopes they will, Iran will probably attack Israel. Then, Ritter said, the United States will drop a nuclear bomb on Iran. ”
It's the only way we can go to war with anyone else right now. We don't have the manpower -- oh, unless you want a draft, and the Bush Administration loves their high-tech movie-plot weapons anyway -- God, I bet Bush'll hit that little red button and make a pious-sounding speech on TV that's really all about the size of the Presidential Weenie.
They Decided to Invade, Then Picked The Data to Lie With
Teasing out the horror of the Bush Administration: The Irrelevance of Intelligence, and "Rational Actors", where the author confirms that the decision to invade Iraq had nothing to do with intelligence, bad or otherwise.
Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq: Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says
I underscore these points: the Bush administration was repeatedly told that Saddam was being kept "in his box," and that the best policy was one of aggressive inspections and the avoidance of war. The Bush administration was repeatedly told that the prospects for Western-style democracy in Iraq were very bleak, and that Iraq's economy and infrastructure would require the expenditure of massive amounts of U.S. funds if they were to recover. The Bush administration was repeatedly warned that, in the aftermath of an invasion, it was highly probable that violence would be directed against the American forces -- and that violence would also ensue between the various factions within Iraq.
Not only did the Bush administration misrepresent and lie about all of this to the American public and to the world: it did not make any plans at all to deal with even one aspect of these momentous problems.
Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq: Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says
"Official intelligence on Iraqi weapons programs was flawed, but even with its flaws, it was not what led to the war," Pillar wrote in the upcoming issue of the journal Foreign Affairs. Instead, he asserted, the administration "went to war without requesting -- and evidently without being influenced by -- any strategic-level intelligence assessments on any aspect of Iraq."
"It has become clear that official intelligence was not relied on in making even the most significant national security decisions, that intelligence was misused publicly to justify decisions already made...."
Lying About FISA
The Administration's new FISA defense is factually false
Glenn Greenwald notes, Gen Hayden's excuse for the Administration bypassing getting FISA warrants "is because the 'probable cause' standard for obtaining a FISA warrant was too onerous (and prevented them from obtaining warrants they needed to eavesdrop)".
Well, that's obviously bullshit, as Greenwald points out, since the Administration, when previously offered a chance to change that very standard, said "oh, no, we're fine."
Glenn Greenwald notes, Gen Hayden's excuse for the Administration bypassing getting FISA warrants "is because the 'probable cause' standard for obtaining a FISA warrant was too onerous (and prevented them from obtaining warrants they needed to eavesdrop)".
Well, that's obviously bullshit, as Greenwald points out, since the Administration, when previously offered a chance to change that very standard, said "oh, no, we're fine."
Friday, February 10, 2006
No big surprise
Get ready for the white men of the Republican party to lecture black leaders about not knowing their place
At the funeral of Coretta Scott King, the grande dame of America's civil rights and progressive activist community, the Rev. Dr. Joseph Lowery, a revered elder of that same community, criticized President Bush, and the war, and the fact that America still has so many poor and needy. Kind of something you'd expect at the funeral of a woman who after her husband was assassinated, yet the day before he was buried, led a civil rights march of 50,000 people. A woman who spoke at an anti-war rally in NYC only 3 weeks after her husband was mattered. A woman who devoted her entire life to non-violence.
I say this because you know it's only a matter of hours before the Republican Swift Boating of Rev. Lowery and Coretta's funeral begins. How dare a black man not know his place at a funeral, they'll say. As if the Republican party and its surrogates have any right whatsoever to speak on behalf of Mrs. King, to tell black America what they can and cannot do to honor one of their most revered leaders.
A party that doesn't have a single African-American member of Congress has no right lecturing black people about knowing their place.[Emphasis added.]
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
The Latest From Black Box Voting -- Opening Diebold
(Permission granted to copy, distribute, reprint, or cite granted - requires link to http://www.blackboxvoting.org, credit source.)
SIX MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS FOR ELECTIONS:
1) Diebold agrees to waive proprietary claims to GEMS database files http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/17793.html
This is big, and has nationwide implications as it can open up access for Volusia County, San Diego County, DuPage County, and other areas where questions have arisen on voting machine results.
Black Box Voting has been assisting the Alaska Democratic Party in fighting for the right to obtain the Diebold "central tabulator" database files.
The crux of the dispute: According to Alaska Democrats, official results from Alaska's 2004 election are riddled with discrepancies but the Alaska Division of Elections refused to turn over the voting files to the Democrats, arguing that the data format belongs to Diebold and can't be made public. Diebold told Alaska officials it owns the "structure of the database."
Today, Diebold caved and released its proprietary claims. The formal letter from Diebold and the implications of this, which are significant, can be read at the link above.
AND THIS:
2) Though you may already have heard that the US Supreme Court is getting a case on electronic voting, you may not have seen the particulars.
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/17790.html
Pennsylvania's Lynn Landes is fighting the suit in the Supreme Court as a citizen, by herself, with no lawyer (called a "Pro Se" case). She follows in the footsteps of the founder of Pennsyvlania, William Penn, who himself fought a Pro Se case which established the power of citizen juries in English and American jurisprudence. Others who fought and won Pro Se cases include Nelson Mandela and Emma Goldman. Landes, in taking this on by herself, honors the Sufragettes, who also fought a seemingly unwinnable battle. (Until they won.)
Landes has asked the Supreme Court to examine the important issue of financial penalities invoked against those who file civil rights cases. She has also asked the court to allow her to have her voting civil rights case heard. For an analysis of the important and creative issues in her case, and to view the lawsuit itself, go to the link above, and also see Lynn Landes's site: http://www.ecotalk.org/Lawsuit.htm
AND MORE: NEW DOCUMENTS
3) Important new information is coming out by way of transcripts and depositions obtained by Black Box Voting. Grab some popcorn. These documents are available here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/2197/17789.html
The documents, which include personal sworn testimony by 23-count felon (for computer crimes) Jeffrey Dean, who ended up creating the programs that process ballots and votes in much of the USA, are filled with new information:
- Dean achieved remote access into several California counties for the 2000 election. He did this to run a "VoteRemote" program, and it involved transferring data back and forth from his office in a suburb of Seattle.
- Dean sold vaporware to the state of Colorado
- In one election, on software for an absentee ballot counter that Dean helped create, Sacramento County was unable to get results out of the system until days after the election
- The documents contain testimony indicating that Jeffrey Dean began programming components for King County absentee balloting while STILL IN PRISON.
- A great deal of new information is provided about how Dean got involved in elections, how Global Election Systems took over Dean's company (Spectrum), and then Diebold took over Global and Spectrum, and other information of historical significance.
- The documents also contain copies of checks forged by Jeffrey Dean.
Even Black Box Voting has not read all of these documents yet. They are hot off the scanner and full of surprises.
AND THIS: AN IMPORTANT ISSUE THAT HASN'T BEEN ADDRESSED:
4) What protects your personal information once it enters e-elections?
here are the kinds of databases that are and will be created with new e-elections technology:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/17778.html
- Massive computerized statewide voter registration databases
- Voter identification cards and voter biometrics
- VoteRemote-style electronic signature databases
- Electronic poll check-in databases
- And proposed by some companies, databases for electronic
verification of your vote
Are there any laws at all that protect this kind of information from being purchased by companies like Choicepoint, one of the nation's primary resellers of personal information to homeland security, law enforcement agents, employers, insurance agencies and direct marketing groups?
Choicepoint, according to the Atlanta Constitution and the Associated Press, has purchased voter registration databases before. It has a $60 million contract with the Department of Homeland Security, and was one of the first clients to sign up with lobbyist "The Ashcroft Group" -- run by former attorney general John Ashcroft.
Within 24 hours of publishing this story, which is about the issues that remain to be addressed in the ethics and regulations of data-brokering for elections information, the president of Choicepoint called Bev Harris.
In this surprising conversation, he revealed that his wife is on the board of directors for VoteTrustUSA. He said he did not believe this needs to be disclosed.
He pointed out that Black Box Voting erred in the article [in] saying there were ties with Choicepoint and Equifax, and Black Box Voting issued a correction in the story to that effect.
For more information on Choicepoint, see EPIC.org:
http://www.epic.org/privacy/choicepoint/
5) This story was broken by BradBlog, and it's important:
A court has ordered a re-do of an election in Ohio, due to Diebold touch screens recording too many votes.
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002379.htm
6) Volusia County poll tapes are up here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/2197/15675.html
Black Box Voting found numerous irregularities in the poll tapes from Volusia County's 2004 election. The images of the tapes are now posted, along with a list of the anomalies.
Among the problems:
Precinct 215: Multiple anomalies including mismatched vote counts
Precinct 303: A white rectangle appears in the zero tape and the public defender's race doesn't appear on zero tape
Precinct 305: A documented case of time travel? Reported date on voting machine is 18,000 years in the future.
Precinct 417: Doozy of a time error on results report. Poll workers noticed it, signed off on it, thinking the clock stamp on the results report was about an hour off. However, the clock was actually nearly 13 hours off. In fact, it had not advanced even one second during the entire day while the voting machine was counting ballots. This gets into a tech discussion of CPUs and clocks, and is very difficult to explain.
Precinct 527: Race # 60 recorded "zero" votes for both ballot choices (all other races did record votes). The long report shows no undervotes.
About a dozen precincts have "memory card error" on the tape. Tapes for dozens of precincts reveal that the machines were not tested before the election. Several time discrepancies, one zero report was run at 11 p.m. with results appearing at midnight.
* * * * *
SIX MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS FOR ELECTIONS:
1) Diebold agrees to waive proprietary claims to GEMS database files http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/17793.html
This is big, and has nationwide implications as it can open up access for Volusia County, San Diego County, DuPage County, and other areas where questions have arisen on voting machine results.
Black Box Voting has been assisting the Alaska Democratic Party in fighting for the right to obtain the Diebold "central tabulator" database files.
The crux of the dispute: According to Alaska Democrats, official results from Alaska's 2004 election are riddled with discrepancies but the Alaska Division of Elections refused to turn over the voting files to the Democrats, arguing that the data format belongs to Diebold and can't be made public. Diebold told Alaska officials it owns the "structure of the database."
Today, Diebold caved and released its proprietary claims. The formal letter from Diebold and the implications of this, which are significant, can be read at the link above.
AND THIS:
2) Though you may already have heard that the US Supreme Court is getting a case on electronic voting, you may not have seen the particulars.
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/17790.html
Pennsylvania's Lynn Landes is fighting the suit in the Supreme Court as a citizen, by herself, with no lawyer (called a "Pro Se" case). She follows in the footsteps of the founder of Pennsyvlania, William Penn, who himself fought a Pro Se case which established the power of citizen juries in English and American jurisprudence. Others who fought and won Pro Se cases include Nelson Mandela and Emma Goldman. Landes, in taking this on by herself, honors the Sufragettes, who also fought a seemingly unwinnable battle. (Until they won.)
Landes has asked the Supreme Court to examine the important issue of financial penalities invoked against those who file civil rights cases. She has also asked the court to allow her to have her voting civil rights case heard. For an analysis of the important and creative issues in her case, and to view the lawsuit itself, go to the link above, and also see Lynn Landes's site: http://www.ecotalk.org/Lawsuit.htm
AND MORE: NEW DOCUMENTS
3) Important new information is coming out by way of transcripts and depositions obtained by Black Box Voting. Grab some popcorn. These documents are available here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/2197/17789.html
The documents, which include personal sworn testimony by 23-count felon (for computer crimes) Jeffrey Dean, who ended up creating the programs that process ballots and votes in much of the USA, are filled with new information:
- Dean achieved remote access into several California counties for the 2000 election. He did this to run a "VoteRemote" program, and it involved transferring data back and forth from his office in a suburb of Seattle.
- Dean sold vaporware to the state of Colorado
- In one election, on software for an absentee ballot counter that Dean helped create, Sacramento County was unable to get results out of the system until days after the election
- The documents contain testimony indicating that Jeffrey Dean began programming components for King County absentee balloting while STILL IN PRISON.
- A great deal of new information is provided about how Dean got involved in elections, how Global Election Systems took over Dean's company (Spectrum), and then Diebold took over Global and Spectrum, and other information of historical significance.
- The documents also contain copies of checks forged by Jeffrey Dean.
Even Black Box Voting has not read all of these documents yet. They are hot off the scanner and full of surprises.
AND THIS: AN IMPORTANT ISSUE THAT HASN'T BEEN ADDRESSED:
4) What protects your personal information once it enters e-elections?
here are the kinds of databases that are and will be created with new e-elections technology:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/17778.html
- Massive computerized statewide voter registration databases
- Voter identification cards and voter biometrics
- VoteRemote-style electronic signature databases
- Electronic poll check-in databases
- And proposed by some companies, databases for electronic
verification of your vote
Are there any laws at all that protect this kind of information from being purchased by companies like Choicepoint, one of the nation's primary resellers of personal information to homeland security, law enforcement agents, employers, insurance agencies and direct marketing groups?
Choicepoint, according to the Atlanta Constitution and the Associated Press, has purchased voter registration databases before. It has a $60 million contract with the Department of Homeland Security, and was one of the first clients to sign up with lobbyist "The Ashcroft Group" -- run by former attorney general John Ashcroft.
Within 24 hours of publishing this story, which is about the issues that remain to be addressed in the ethics and regulations of data-brokering for elections information, the president of Choicepoint called Bev Harris.
In this surprising conversation, he revealed that his wife is on the board of directors for VoteTrustUSA. He said he did not believe this needs to be disclosed.
He pointed out that Black Box Voting erred in the article [in] saying there were ties with Choicepoint and Equifax, and Black Box Voting issued a correction in the story to that effect.
For more information on Choicepoint, see EPIC.org:
http://www.epic.org/privacy/choicepoint/
5) This story was broken by BradBlog, and it's important:
A court has ordered a re-do of an election in Ohio, due to Diebold touch screens recording too many votes.
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002379.htm
6) Volusia County poll tapes are up here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/2197/15675.html
Black Box Voting found numerous irregularities in the poll tapes from Volusia County's 2004 election. The images of the tapes are now posted, along with a list of the anomalies.
Among the problems:
Precinct 215: Multiple anomalies including mismatched vote counts
Precinct 303: A white rectangle appears in the zero tape and the public defender's race doesn't appear on zero tape
Precinct 305: A documented case of time travel? Reported date on voting machine is 18,000 years in the future.
Precinct 417: Doozy of a time error on results report. Poll workers noticed it, signed off on it, thinking the clock stamp on the results report was about an hour off. However, the clock was actually nearly 13 hours off. In fact, it had not advanced even one second during the entire day while the voting machine was counting ballots. This gets into a tech discussion of CPUs and clocks, and is very difficult to explain.
Precinct 527: Race # 60 recorded "zero" votes for both ballot choices (all other races did record votes). The long report shows no undervotes.
About a dozen precincts have "memory card error" on the tape. Tapes for dozens of precincts reveal that the machines were not tested before the election. Several time discrepancies, one zero report was run at 11 p.m. with results appearing at midnight.
* * * * *
Saturday, February 04, 2006
RIP Betty Friedan
Betty Friedan, Who Ignited Cause in 'Feminine Mystique,' Dies at 85. You changed the world.
Thursday, February 02, 2006
Time for a Revolution
Senator Russ Feingold on the Pre-1776 Mentality
If this is pre-1776, then it's time for a revolution.
If this is pre-1776, then it's time for a revolution.
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
EFF files class action lawsuit over NSA eavesdropping
Against AT&T, for providing access to its network and databases.
Privacy group sues AT&T over alleged surveillance
Privacy group sues AT&T over alleged surveillance
The class-action lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, seeks to stop the surveillance program that started shortly after the 2001 terrorist attacks. It also seeks billions of dollars in damages.
The EFF claims the San Antonio-based telecommunications company not only provided direct access to its network that carries voice and data but also to its massive databases of stored telephone and Internet records that are updated constantly.
"Our main goal is to stop this invasion of privacy, prevent it from occurring again and make sure AT&T and all the other carriers understand there are going to be legal and economic consequences when they fail to follow the law," said Kevin Bankston, an EFF staff attorney.
President Bush has acknowledged authorizing the super-secret NSA to eavesdrop on international phone calls and e-mails of people within U.S. borders without the approval of a court, as required by existing surveillance and wiretapping laws.
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Saturday, January 28, 2006
Yep, Abramoff is a Republican Scandal, Through and Through
A new analysis of Abramoff tribal money by a nonpartisan firm shows it’s a Republican scandal.
The article notes "when Abramoff entered the picture, contributions to Dems dropped, while donations to Republicans more than doubled."
Sounds like Republican scandal to me.
[I]t’s highly misleading to suggest that the tribes's giving to Dems was in any way comparable to their giving to the GOP. The analysis shows that when Abramoff took on his tribal clients, the majority of them dramatically ratcheted up donations to Republicans. Meanwhile, donations to Democrats from the same clients either dropped, remained largely static or, in two cases, rose by a far smaller percentage than the ones to Republicans did. This pattern suggests that whatever money went to Democrats, rather than having been steered by Abramoff, may have largely been money the tribes would have given anyway.
These patterns strongly suggest that Abramoff’s representation of the tribes manifested itself largely in a dramatic rise in contributions to the GOP. And it also suggests it’s likely that Abramoff had little impact on giving to Democrats.
The article notes "when Abramoff entered the picture, contributions to Dems dropped, while donations to Republicans more than doubled."
Sounds like Republican scandal to me.
The Truth About Abortion
When it's illegal, or 'suppressed', like it is today, women die.
Moms. Daughters. Sisters. Wives.
They die.
We die.
Maybe I die.
More at The 3rd WWWave
Moms. Daughters. Sisters. Wives.
They die.
We die.
Maybe I die.
More at The 3rd WWWave
Faux "Joke" Should Get Coulter Arrested, IMO
For threatening a Supreme Court Justice.
I fail to find this thigh-slappingly funny, in much the same way that others might fail to find it funny when people joke about killing presidents, or popping off, say, half of the legislative branch of our government.
I fail to find this thigh-slappingly funny, in much the same way that others might fail to find it funny when people joke about killing presidents, or popping off, say, half of the legislative branch of our government.
So, Ann Coulter engages in more "unhinged" speech by suggesting that Justice John Paul Stevens ought to be killed:"We need somebody to put rat poisoning in Justice Stevens' creme brulee," Coulter said. "That's just a joke, for you in the media."
Of course! How could I have missed that? Just a joke!
Although, perhaps, Ann could explain just what was supposed to be humorous about it. Perhaps I'm just dense, but assassinations have never been very funny matters in my experience. Is this a new hip thing?
Friday, January 27, 2006
Pictures are Worth A Thousand Words
Here are many thousands: Indelible Images of a Failed Presidency
Thought for the Day
US audit finds 'spectacular' waste of funds in Iraq
And, in our corrupt center of government, Prosecutor Will Step Down From Lobbyist Case. To wit, "the chief prosecutor in the inquiry would step down next week because he had been nominated to a federal judgeship by President Bush." Hm!
So good to know, when, what, hundreds of thousands? of senior citizens are getting shafted by their "new and improved" medical care.
(PATIENTS SNARLED IN MEDICARE MESS, leaving the states holding the bag, natch.
State To Help Those Denied Drugs by Medicare Errors)
Meanwhile, my senators step up to the plate.
And, in our corrupt center of government, Prosecutor Will Step Down From Lobbyist Case. To wit, "the chief prosecutor in the inquiry would step down next week because he had been nominated to a federal judgeship by President Bush." Hm!
So good to know, when, what, hundreds of thousands? of senior citizens are getting shafted by their "new and improved" medical care.
(PATIENTS SNARLED IN MEDICARE MESS, leaving the states holding the bag, natch.
State To Help Those Denied Drugs by Medicare Errors)
Meanwhile, my senators step up to the plate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)